- From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:24:24 -0700
- To: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
I agree with other comments that we should just have one, and it should be navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia. The existing implementations can leave navigator.getUserMedia during a transition period. We're already doing similar transition periods for things like constraints and other API changes. On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > Since day one of WebRTC (this was before we spun off the local media > things into a TF) the way to get access to camera and microphone has been: > > navigator.getUserMedia(....); > > from the spec version of June 19th [1] it is also possible to do > > navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia(....); > > Shijun filed a bug on that we should keep one way (not both) [2]. > > The comments so far seem to indicate that while > navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia is more logical we should only keep > the old navigator.getUserMedia method since many apps are using it. But > there has also been the comment that this is behind vendor prefix so > changing does not have that big consequences (and perhaps > implementations could support the old prefixed way for a long time even > if the spec changes). > > I'd like some more discussion, and a conclusion. What should the spec say? > > Stefan > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/archives/20140619/getusermedia.html > [2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26243 > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2014 17:25:32 UTC