Re: New dated Editors' draft v20140817

On 08/18/2014 07:03 AM, Kiran Kumar Guduru wrote:
> Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle
>
> Hi,
>
> After a quick review about the two changes in the document, I have the 
> following comments.
>
> 1. Ths links of *NotFoundError *and *AbortError *should refer to DOM4 
> error names section 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2014May/0020.html
>
> 2. DOM4 document should be added to normative references list.
>

We decided that the error structure has to be independent from DOM4, 
since DOM4 has promised to remove the corresponding construct, and what 
we should point to instead (if anything) is not yet clear. So the 
reference needs to be informative, not normative.

See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22251 for some of the 
back-and-forth.

> 3. Since *SourceUnavailable *is a new error type defined in this 
> document, it should be added to Error names list in *section 13 *of 
> this document.
>

NotFoundError and AbortError need to be listed in this section too, for 
the above reason.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25988 covers this item - 
thanks for the reminder!

> As some time back it was instructed that chairs only has to raise bugs 
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2014May/0021.html), 
> I request chairs to take decision to raise bugs for above points for 
> tracking.
>

22251 and 25988 should cover it. I've updated 25988

> Regards,
>
> Kiran.
>
> ------- *Original Message* -------
>
> *Sender* : Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com>
>
> *Date* : Aug 17, 2014 22:28 (GMT+09:00)
>
> *Title* : New dated Editors' draft v20140817
>
> Hi
>
> A new dated version of the editors' draft is available.
>
> Dated version: 
> http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/archives/20140817/getusermedia.html
> Living document: http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html
>
> Changes include:
> • Bug 22251: Added new NotFoundError, AbortError, SourceUnavailable 
> errors to gUM call.
> • Bug 25786: User agent allowance of files to be substituted for any 
> input device is now permitted but not listed as best practice, i.e., 
> no longer specifically recommended.
>
> Please review and provide feedback.
>
> Dan Burnett (for the editors)
>