- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:29:44 -0400
- To: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org, public-media-capture@w3.org
On 8/6/14 9:09 PM, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26526
>
> Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
>
> --- Comment #1 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> ---
> We handle width and height separately, why not { aspect: {x : 16, y : 9} }.
> Doesn't seem that complicated.
But unnecessary. Width and height are separate constraints, not a
multi-property constraint. I.e. not { video: { exact: size: { w: 640, h:
480 } } };
I think there's a better case size to be our first multi-property
constraint than aspect, as the former is a two-dimensional space and the
latter just a ratio.
AspectRatio, frameRate and volume all use double, and we need to compare
them. There may be future double constraints as well, so I think an
epsilon value is smart.
.: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 02:30:12 UTC