Re: [Bug 23220] Add 'zoom' constraint to VideoStreamTrack

FWIW, I'd like to have the capability to zoom into a specific part of
a screen share and only transport that part of the screen over to the
peer.

I'm not fuzzed if it's provided in version 1.0 or later, but I'd
definitely like to see such functionality supported eventually.

Cheers,
Silvia.


On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@quicinc.com> wrote:
> You have also stated separately that if a bug has been out and not debated for 6 days, that the bug is 'uncontroversial' - see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013Sep/0180.html.  Bug 23220 was out for slightly longer without any debate.  I could use your logic to come to the conclusion that bug 23220 is 'uncontroversial', but I'll settle to merely use your comments on bug 23263 as an example of what I believe is inconsistency on your part.
>
> And I do not believe this is a case of "one person has said that he wants in the spec":  see https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/media-stream-capture/proposals/SettingsAPI_proposal_v6.html#changing-zoom-in-response-to-user-input.
>
> I will request that you leave the bug unresolved for now and allow me to present a case to the mailing list.  Otherwise I will re-file the bug, because I do think this needs to be resolved before last call.
>
> -Giri
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 2:47 PM
> To: public-media-capture@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [Bug 23220] Add 'zoom' constraint to VideoStreamTrack
>
> On 09/27/2013 06:08 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:
>> I will refile this bug.  I think it is inappropriate for the chair to
>> arbitrarily close bugs filed by group members based on his own
>> opinion, and I believe the explanation is provided is not sufficient
>
> Giri, you have failed to get support for your position.
>
> Please focus on showing that there is support in the group for adding zoom to *version 1.0 of the spec*. At the moment, all that is clear is that you want it.
>
> We are not using open bugs in the bug tracker to keep track of all the ideas that one person has said that he wants in the spec; we're using it to keep track of where the spec needs to be modified before we can issue a WG Last Call on version 1.0.
>
>
>> -Giri
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org [mailto:bugzilla@jessica.w3.org]
>> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 5:37 AM
>> To: public-media-capture@w3.org
>> Subject: [Bug 23220] Add 'zoom' constraint to VideoStreamTrack
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23220
>>
>> Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> changed:
>>
>>             What    |Removed                     |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>               Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>>                   CC|                            |harald@alvestrand.no
>>           Resolution|---                         |LATER
>>
>> --- Comment #1 from Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> --- Closing as "wontfix" - the way we manipulate settings that a) are unique to the device and b) can't be simply turned on and off is a bigger subject that we shouldn't expect to tackle in the 1.0 version of the spec.
>>
>> There is some discussion of pan/tilt/zoom in the minutes from the Feb 5-7 interim meeting.
>>
>> --
>> You are receiving this mail because:
>> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>> You are the assignee for the bug.
>>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 29 September 2013 04:40:38 UTC