I tend to agree with this conclusion. That said, the guidance I've received indicates that this is a little better understood than Anne suggests. That guidance is pretty clear: it is not currently a good idea to talk to users about fingerprinting risks, no matter how the question is formulated. But times, and people, change, so putting this side for now seems wise. On Sep 24, 2013 7:55 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> > wrote: > > Adding directly the 3 people who I think you have to convince explicitly. > > I think we need to revisit this at some point in a more general > context. I think being able to indicate somehow (declarative maybe, > manifest) what you need and having success/failure for these as the > user starts using the respective features (or you might grant a few if > the user bookmarks the app) might make sense. > > I don't think we're quite there yet though in fully understanding what > an app on the web is. It's fine to experiment, but too soon to > standardize. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 22:07:24 UTC