- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:23:29 -0700
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 6 September 2013 06:20, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > Thus, in my view, the first paragraph of > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23128 is a good thing, not a > problem, and the ability to obtain "the full range of permissions that a > page would want" arbitrarily far ahead of actually using those permission > would be an antifeature, and significantly worse than the permission prompts > we currently have. I wholeheartedly agree. This being the key (from ROC's blog posting): "If I don't grant the permissions, I can't use the app. " Holding functionality hostage, even if it's just implied, is going to create some serious negative consequences. Grant of consent needs to be tied to the activity, and more than just tied: it's best if it's an integral part of the action. getUserMedia is still a potential consent-failure in the offing, but at least sites are discouraged a little from making the request since the act of asking has a direct and immediate effect. APIs that allow for preliminary setup like getPermissions very easily generate a situation where a user gets consent fatigue.
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 17:24:00 UTC