Re: gUM's optional constraints algorithm penalizes user-choice chasing best-match for webpage from Martin Thomson on 2013-09-03 (public-media-capture@w3.org from September 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:21:38 -0700
To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXb8ELe1-d3AgzeL=SnqOvVzFo2SMxSPSBrOvbod9E-aQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2 September 2013 10:39, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:
> In practice, with the above interpretation, I am confident that browsers
> will make nice user-experiences here that respects the wishes of the webpage
> without compromising choice for the user.

That's the key.  When I said that I'd basically only use optional
constraints to order sources, that's something that a browser
implementation should have the freedom to choose on its own.

Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 17:22:08 UTC