Re: Extending createObjectUrl to MediaStream?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> On 2013-09-02 01:44, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com
> > <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     One need I can see is when you want to display the video in another
> >     window. Let's say you want to have the video in a popout window -
> >     something I think we should definitely support - handing that window
> the
> >     URL (using postMessage) for use by its video element is a very
> >     convenient way to support this use-case. This works in Chrome today.
> >
> >
> > Assuming the main window opened the popout window, and both pages have
> > the same origin, this can be done without createObjectURL or any new
> > features, because the main window has access to the DOM of the popout
> > window (and vice versa).
>
> Yes, but I don't think we should constrain this to only meet cases when
> the origin of the other window is the same.
>

What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly, what
are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the developer?

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*

Received on Monday, 2 September 2013 23:29:38 UTC