Re: Proposed new text for noaccess from Martin Thomson on 2013-10-29 (public-media-capture@w3.org from October 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:53:07 -0700
To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWTcwupxSKfJ=vjHGjwJBGbWaQ-yXn3wE2fedY6d7j_dQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 29 October 2013 16:48, Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@quicinc.com> wrote:
> Problem:  As far as I can tell, no permissions UI was ever presented to the user in the above scenario, because the "noaccess" constraint was never changed.  Is this the desired behavior?

This would be expressly prohibited.  Any pixel on the screen that is
altered by the "noaccess" stream cannot be captured by the
application.  The intent is that anything constrained as "noaccess" is
inaccessible to applications.

Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2013 23:53:34 UTC