- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:44:58 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 25/10/13 20:39, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 25 October 2013 11:24, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> adding a track that is already there will just silently >> fail IIUC. > > Adding a track that is already there has already succeeded. > >> if it is removed the second after it will be gone > > If it is removed just after that, then it was removed afterwards and > it doesn't matter if it was one second or 100. That's just the nature > of the beast. My point was that you'd get different results if you designed in this (clumsy) way depending on timing of certain (local and remote) actions. > If you want to guarantee that it's there, add it and > register for removal events so that you can re-add it. I agree fully (and I'm not pushing for the intro of different types of MediaStream's). >
Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 18:45:21 UTC