- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:16:58 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-10-21 07:12, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 10/21/2013 07:05 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> On 2013-10-19 21:42, Martin Thomson wrote: >>> On 18 October 2013 21:57, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> >>> wrote: >>>> the only argument I can think of in favour of using "kind" to indicate >>>> audioOut is that it doesn't trip up code that is only looking at the >>>> "kind" field. >>> >>> It's a good argument. You could also change "audio" to "audioIn" if >>> you feel that symmetry is necessary. >>> >> >> For some reason I don't think camel case looks that nice in string >> literals. I suggested "audio-output" and "audio-input" in an earlier >> mail. > Given that most of the API uses camelCase or CamelCase, I find dashes > jarring. > There should really be some web platform API guide-lines regarding this to make it consistent. /Adam
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 05:17:20 UTC