Re: Constraints as a separate interface from Adam Bergkvist on 2013-10-16 (public-media-capture@w3.org from October 2013)

From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:33:52 +0200
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <525E2540.7060900@ericsson.com>

On 2013-10-11 09:39, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> - I don't understand the value of having an interface for
> PropertyValueRange (and a constructor) where a simple dictionary would
> work;

I agree. A dictionary is preferable since we can get rid of the 
redundant constructor name and get named properties instead.

/Adam

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 05:34:16 UTC