W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Constraints as a separate interface

From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:33:52 +0200
Message-ID: <525E2540.7060900@ericsson.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-10-11 09:39, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> - I don't understand the value of having an interface for
> PropertyValueRange (and a constructor) where a simple dictionary would
> work;

I agree. A dictionary is preferable since we can get rid of the 
redundant constructor name and get named properties instead.

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 05:34:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:20 UTC