- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:39:10 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-10-05 06:46, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 10/03/2013 04:28 PM, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote: >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22264 >> >> Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> CC| |adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com >> >> --- Comment #2 from Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> --- >> With the change from ended to inactive (for MediaStream) I replaced the text in >> the ended (now inactive) attribute description that dictated the behavior for >> the constructor with a more general text: >> >> "When a MediaStream object is created, its inactive attribute MUST be set to >> false, unless stated otherwise (for example by the MediaStream() constructor >> algorithm)." >> >> I've added text in the constructor algorithm to initialize the inactive >> attribute accordingly. Currently the constructor disregards from ended tracks >> used as input, but that's perhaps a separate discussion. >> >> Proposed change: >> https://github.com/fluffy/webrtc-w3c/commit/9ff8a5d160e3319825652ed8d135df6921817dd6 >> > If we're changing the name of the concept anyway, perhaps we should > change it to "active"? > > Names with negation in them always make me feel negative. I think that makes sense. The concept of an "active" stream is already used in the spec to talk about a stream that is not inactive, so it would be a small edit. /Adam
Received on Monday, 7 October 2013 07:39:35 UTC