W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > May 2013

RE: Questions/Comments on Media Stream Recording

From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:10:54 +0000
To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
CC: "mandyam@quicinc.com" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281040BFE@GENSJZMBX02.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
  Yes, this is true.  However in some circles/languages it is considered very bad style to access instance variables directly
(particularly for code outside the class).  Do we share this view?  

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Bergkvist [mailto:adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:07 AM
To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
Cc: mandyam@quicinc.com; Jim Barnett; public-media-capture@w3.org
Subject: Re: Questions/Comments on Media Stream Recording

On 2013-05-22 22:49, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote:
> onstop, onerror and maybe onwarning events  could need access  to 
> accessor to allow MediaStream termination if needed.

Regarding getting access to the stream being recorded (point 5 in original mail); this is already supported via the event model.

recorder.onstop = function (evt) {

   // find the stream via the event target (the recorder)
   var recStream = evt.target.stream;

   // or if you have a reference to the recorder you
   // can access it directly
   recStream = recorder.stream;


Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 13:11:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:17 UTC