Re: Cloning and sharing of MediaStreamTracks - worth it? from Martin Thomson on 2013-05-09 (public-media-capture@w3.org from May 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 08:50:45 -0700
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVZRnWPQGfZBTSLetvmdOZH4AULKAn9EaUA6DvryT6peQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 9 May 2013 00:02, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> Having some attributes affect all tracks but others affect just one of the
> clones sounds confusing. Maybe it would be simpler to prevent cloning and
> share track objects when necessary.

Only if you consider the attributes to be track attributes, not source
attributes.  Arguably, those attributes that affect all tracks should
be moved to a source object.

Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 15:51:13 UTC