- From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 12:31:07 +0000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Stefan, In an earlier email you said that all constraints/settings applied to the source. So it sounds like they're all shared. Is 'enabled' the only setting that is Track-specific? If there are others, which are they? We should be very clear which settings apply to the Track and which apply to the source. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Håkansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 7:46 AM To: robert@ocallahan.org Cc: Martin Thomson; Jim Barnett; Harald Alvestrand; public-media-capture@w3.org Subject: Re: Cloning and sharing of MediaStreamTracks - worth it? On 2013-05-09 09:02, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > Having some attributes affect all tracks but others affect just one of > the clones sounds confusing. All that is shared belongs to the source - and that must be shared. > Maybe it would be simpler to prevent > cloning and share track objects when necessary. I think the current design is quite OK. > > Rob > -- > q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q > qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq > qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q > qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq > qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq > qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 12:31:36 UTC