- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:46:02 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-03-20 18:12, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 20 March 2013 07:33, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> wrote: >> On 2013-03-19 14:00, Jim Barnett wrote: >>> >>> The final decision of what to display should be up to the sink. If >>> there are sinks that can handle MediaStreams containing multiple >>> audio or video tracks, then they should be able to use whatever >>> heuristics they want to select the Track(s) to play out. > > I'm concerned with the non-deterministic behaviour that could happen > if we don't make something explicit here. I agree. We need to do something about this since we removed the order of the tracks and there's no logical "first" track of each kind anymore. But if the sink has some mechanism for enumerating tracks and selecting which one to render, then that should just work for MediaStreams as well. However, selecting a track is no guarantee that there's data on it; it might just be muted on track-level anyhow. /Adam
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 06:46:38 UTC