- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:03:43 +0100
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 2013-03-19 09:48, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 03/19/2013 09:05 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> On 2013-03-19 07:27, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>> An alternate method of straightening out the API would be to rename the >>> addTrack operator to addCopyOfTrack or >>> addTrackWithSameSourceAsTheArgument. >>> >>> I think the ability to control tracks-in-streams independently is more >>> important than the linkages you mention, but agree that the API name >>> doesn't fit with what the operation does. >>> >> >> I'm not arguing to remove that functionality, just that it would be >> more intuitive, IMO, to clone the track first and then add it to the >> new stream if you wanted a independent instance to control. >> > > and I'm arguing that having *dependent* instance control (that is, > muting a track in one stream mutes it in all other streams too) is > behaviour I don't want.... I think that particular issue, with enabling/disable, is application specific. /Adam
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 09:04:08 UTC