W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Communicating memory pressure in mediastream recording

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:32:45 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLboswyumyXt-c-+c7u-R6L6qbWLuhFV5Syh2_Vk6RZ0Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org>
Cc: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org> wrote:

> Curious - if we implement disk backing store, should the disk space usage
> count against the temporary HTML5 storage? (In which case the app could
> query usage/quota for a bit more fine-grained control than LOW_MEMORY)
>

I think temporary storage that will go away when the page closes should be
in a different bucket from storage that will survive the page. The latter
is likely to be much more valuable than the former.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 23:33:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC