W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Recording and MIME types (Re: Mediastream Recording implementation)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:35:50 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLb3+-948caCWRS5zpW9+mxtivEZ97Rp-1irjhzOhi34PQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:

> We may have a problem here if we expect a MIME type for each blob.
> MIME types are usually defined in terms of the whole file (or the whole
> stream for RTP MIME types), including any headers that occur only at the
> beginning.
> My expectation is certainly that the MIME type of the file that results
> from concatenating all the blobs needs to be clearly defined and useful,
> but I don't see a reason to have a MIME type for each blob.
> If Blobs have MIME types in general, that may be an argument against using
> Blob.

The MIME type of a Blob is optional. See for example
http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#constructorParams. See also the APIs for
concatenating and slicing Blobs --- the idea that a Blob can represent part
of a resource is not new.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2013 09:36:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC