On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Travis Leithead < travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote: > I don’t know that we ever pinned down the question about what the > mimeType will be though. > When the entire recording is delivered in a single Blob, it's clear that the MIME type should be the actual type of the resource. That's ultra-convenient since anything that uses Blobs and relies on their type will just work. I think it's also clear that for multi-Blob resources, the MIME type of the first Blob should be the actual type of the resource. After all, the MIME type chosen by the recorder has to be reported somewhere. Also, it's often the case that a truncated resource of some container types can be played. For second and subsequent Blobs, it's not clear. We might want to use application/octet-stream to indicate that those Blobs are not valid resources of any type. But I think it doesn't matter much and if we want to give every Blob the MIME type of the resource (which others argued for IIRC), I think that'd be OK. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 21:32:07 UTC