W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > July 2013

Re: DOM Futures

From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:24:11 -0400
Message-ID: <51E1630B.8050105@bbs.darktech.org>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 13/07/2013 3:16 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2013, at 22:06, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>> On 12/07/2013 12:04 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>>> Le vendredi 12 juillet 2013 à 08:55 -0700, Greg Billock a écrit :
>>>> What was the outcome of the call discussing webrtc API and Promises?
>>>> Any conclusions in that direction?
>>> There was reluctance in adopting promises for this version of
>>> getUserMedia given its current implementation status, and similar
>>> reluctance for PeerConnection due its growing current form adoption.
>>> As far as I can tell, the door was left open for Mediastream recording
>>> and Mediastream image capture.
>>> Dom
>>     I disagree. If I recall correctly, there were about 6 members present in the meeting. All but two of them were in favor of DOM Futures but the meeting ended very abruptly and without a resolution.
> This doesn't match my recall at all but perhaps there is some ambiguity about "member". Which four members do you believe were in favor? Certainly I can name at least four people against.
> Ekr
Hi Eric,

     It's possible that we are referring to separate meetings. Where are 
the IRC chat logs posted to?

Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 14:25:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC