- From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:09:45 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
- CC: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
MediaStream recording doesn't seem like an obvious candidate for Promises, because it doesn't have any API calls with success and failure callbacks. Image capture seems like a better fit for Promises, but I don't know what Giri's plans are. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:dom@w3.org] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 12:05 PM To: Greg Billock Cc: Michael[tm] Smith; public-media-capture@w3.org Subject: Re: Mediastream Recording implementation Le vendredi 12 juillet 2013 à 08:55 -0700, Greg Billock a écrit : > What was the outcome of the call discussing webrtc API and Promises? > Any conclusions in that direction? There was reluctance in adopting promises for this version of getUserMedia given its current implementation status, and similar reluctance for PeerConnection due its growing current form adoption. As far as I can tell, the door was left open for Mediastream recording and Mediastream image capture. Dom
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 16:10:13 UTC