- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:00:43 +0100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 01/16/2013 07:54 PM, Ben Pedrick wrote: > Hi all, > > We tackled the recording issue at TokBox about a year ago. We found > that 11 states require all parties to know and consent to being > recorded, which is different from consenting to use the camera for a > live conversation. does this mean that 39 states (and an unknown number of other countries) have no such rule, or merely that the rules there are different? > The safest approach is to have a pop-up that specifically requests > permissions for recording. I think allowing developers to freely > record without consent will lead to legal problems for well > intentioned developers who are unaware of the laws they are dealing > with. Asking consent for the camera, but not to record, seems to imply > that recording is acceptable when that may not be the case. I think this can't be solved at browser level; several of the use cases on the media-capture requirements doc (which are usually single-user use cases) would look quite strange if one needed a separate recording permission popup.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 14:01:14 UTC