- From: Alex Gouaillard <alex.gouaillard@temasys.com.sg>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:58:48 +0800
- To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I think it s a good idea as some cannot travel that often. Ietf is tiring but less so than 12~16 hours trips with 6~12 h time difference. Sent from my iPhone On 20 Dec, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > I think this is a bad idea. > > After a week of IETF, people are brutally tired, especially since many of > us have meetings before IETF. > > I am fine with a separate interim either alone or joint with RTCWEB. > > -Ekr > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> There was so far no response to this mail. >> >> But in the interest of making progress, we will start to plan for a F2F >> meeting in London (preliminary for the Media Capture TF and the WebRTC >> WG) the weekend after the London IETF meeting (meaning that the dates in >> question are March 7th - 9th). Let us know if you think this is a bad idea. >> >> The IETF rtcweb WG is also discussing a f2f meeting in late May, our >> idea is to make this a joint meeting with W3C WebRTC WG and Media >> Capture TF. >> >> Stefan for the chairs >> >> On 2013-12-12 13:07, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: >>> Sorry for the cross posting, but this relates to both the TF and the WG. >>> >>> We think that f2f meetings are helpful in progressing the work - it >>> gives much higher bandwidth for the discussion. We'd like to get your >>> view about arranging f2f meetings during the first half of next year >>> (and our thinking is that both the Media Cap TF and the WebRTC WG should >>> meet). >>> >>> - One possibility would be to have a meeting (in London) the weekend >>> after the London IETF meeting, March 8-9 2014. The advantage would be >>> that many of the participants in our work would be there anyway because >>> of the IETF meeting. >>> >>> - Another would be to arrange a separate meeting in (perhaps) May next >>> year, possibly jointly with the rtcweb WG of the IETF. >>> >>> What do you think? Would you join? Should we do one of them (which?), >>> none or both? >>> >>> Stefan for the chairs >>> >>> P.S. I know that the WebRTC F2F in Shenzhen did not work that well due >>> to some special circumstances - but F2F meetings are usually very >>> productive IMO >
Received on Friday, 20 December 2013 17:53:35 UTC