- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:25:39 +0000
- To: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
There was so far no response to this mail. But in the interest of making progress, we will start to plan for a F2F meeting in London (preliminary for the Media Capture TF and the WebRTC WG) the weekend after the London IETF meeting (meaning that the dates in question are March 7th - 9th). Let us know if you think this is a bad idea. The IETF rtcweb WG is also discussing a f2f meeting in late May, our idea is to make this a joint meeting with W3C WebRTC WG and Media Capture TF. Stefan for the chairs On 2013-12-12 13:07, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > Sorry for the cross posting, but this relates to both the TF and the WG. > > We think that f2f meetings are helpful in progressing the work - it > gives much higher bandwidth for the discussion. We'd like to get your > view about arranging f2f meetings during the first half of next year > (and our thinking is that both the Media Cap TF and the WebRTC WG should > meet). > > - One possibility would be to have a meeting (in London) the weekend > after the London IETF meeting, March 8-9 2014. The advantage would be > that many of the participants in our work would be there anyway because > of the IETF meeting. > > - Another would be to arrange a separate meeting in (perhaps) May next > year, possibly jointly with the rtcweb WG of the IETF. > > What do you think? Would you join? Should we do one of them (which?), > none or both? > > Stefan for the chairs > > P.S. I know that the WebRTC F2F in Shenzhen did not work that well due > to some special circumstances - but F2F meetings are usually very > productive IMO > >
Received on Friday, 20 December 2013 13:26:22 UTC