Re: Please review the updated Streams API

Thanks Rob!

All - please send comments about the Streams API to 
public-webapps@w3.org (archive 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/>).

On 12/4/13 4:48 PM, ext Rob Manson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there's an updated W3C Streams API draft available for review and it 
> is obviously very relevant for Media Capture and Streams.
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm
>
> I'd encourage you all to review it and provide any feedback or 
> thoughts you might have.
>
> Feras and Takeshi have been doing a great job integrating and 
> filtering all the feedback they've received and I've personally been 
> pushing for as much focus on making it as effective and useful for 
> post-processing as possible. I'm sure many of you here have a 
> different perspective they would find very valuable.
>
> Below is the email Feras sent to describe where this work is up to.
>
> roBman
>
>
>> On 12/4/13 11:27 AM, ext Feras Moussa wrote:
>> The editors of the Streams API have reached a milestone where we feel
>> many of the major issues that have been identified thus far are now
>> resolved and incorporated in the editors draft.
>>
>> The editors draft [1] has been heavily updated and reviewed the past
>> few weeks to address all concerns raised, including:
>> 1. Separation into two distinct types -ReadableByteStream and
>> WritableByteStream
>> 2. Explicit support for back pressure management
>> 3. Improvements to help with pipe( ) and flow-control management
>> 4. Updated spec text and diagrams for further clarifications
>>
>> There are still a set of bugs being tracked in bugzilla. We would like
>> others to please review the updated proposal, and provide any feedback
>> they may have (or file bugs).
>>
>> Thanks.
>> -Feras
>>
>>
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 21:54:16 UTC