W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Proposal for output device selection

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:49:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2HaiT6p2JGbBWQ981YATZ83Q64KxnMyTUWx80po6qKuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>, Victoria Kirst <vrk@google.com>, Tommy Widenflycht (ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ) <tommyw@google.com>, Tommi Gunnarsson <tommi@google.com>
Yes, I forgot to spell out how the application would route its output to
left/center/right audio devices.

Regardless, if this approach is applicable for input devices, I don't see
why we would want a different model for output.

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>wrote:
>> Different applications may want to have different UIs to control these
>> settings. One application may just want to control a single camera and
>> audio device. Another application may want to have multiple cameras all
>> used in concert, and allow the left/right/center camera/mic devices to be
>> individually selected.
> You seem to be talking about input devices. I thought we were talking
> about output.
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
> waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
> *
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 16:50:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC