W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Proposal for output device selection

From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:06:29 +0200
Message-ID: <520C61D5.7050009@ericsson.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
CC: Sam Dutton <dutton@google.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>, Victoria Kirst <vrk@google.com>, "Tommy Widenflycht (ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ)" <tommyw@google.com>, Tommi Gunnarsson <tommi@google.com>
On 2013-08-14 01:48, Justin Uberti wrote:
>     Also (pedantic): is there a rationale for choosing properties (like
>     sinkId here) over get/set methods such as MediaStream getVideoTracks()?
> I didn't see much precedent for setter functions in the HTML5 DOM; for
> example, you set the source of a HTMLMediaElement via element.src = foo.

getVideoTracks() is a method since we want it to return a new 
independent array (or sequence) every time it's called. As Justin says, 
properties are otherwise the common pattern to expose details of an object.

Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 05:06:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC