- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:09:55 +0200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-04-16 18:45, Martin Thomson wrote: > Let's get this crystal clear. The substance of the change is to: > > a) provide a structure in place of an identifier, where the structure > includes id, label, kind, and facing attributes > > b) provide access only to the id and kind attributes prior to > obtaining any form of user consent > > c) provide access to id, kind AND label attributes (not facing) once > permissions for ANY source is granted > > Your intent here is not to discuss Harald's suggested change to user > interface, but the above. Is that correct? Yes, that is correct (basically what is between <proposal begins> and <proposal ends> in [1]). I did not read any suggested changes to the user interface in Harald proposal, only a discussion on how the suggested changes could be used when it comes to UI. Stefan > > On 16 April 2013 05:27, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> All (speaking as chair), >> >> Harald recently proposed an alternative approach for device enumeration [1] >> that exposes a bit more info to the application than what is in the current >> Editor's draft [2]. >> >> The feedback basically ranged from "I like this" to "I want even more info >> exposed". >> >> The next reasonable step, with that feedback in mind, seems to be to >> incorporate the proposal in the Editor's draft so that it can be reviewed in >> the right context. We can then discuss further e.g. if more data should be >> exposed. >> >> So I ask the Editor's to do that when appropriate. >> >> Stefan >> >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013Mar/0050.html >> [2] http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html >>
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 07:25:59 UTC