- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:15:04 +0200
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-04-15 14:09, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com > <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > Yes, they can. But I see a benefit in addTrack e.g. for > > * An audio conference with local mixing; there is a button "record" > available. If one more participant joins, it would be nice if that > audio track could just be added to the (constructed) MediaStream > being recorded. Otherwise you'd have to construct a new MediaStream > (with all participants), start recording it, stop recording the old > one - and you have to deal with syncing the recorded material > > > This example confuses me. What do you mean by "(constructed) > MediaStream"? I proposed that any MediaStream created by the WebIDL > constructors would support addTrack/removeTrack. I went one step further: no support of add/removeTrack for any MediaStream (since there is now only one type). Sorry for the confusion.
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 12:15:29 UTC