- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:37:12 +0100
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > On 04/07/2013 09:02 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> WebApps does not have formal meetings. > > Then how does it decide that a decision is made? > I'll take pointers to chairs' statements of consensus in archives too. Generally WebApps does not seem to run into that problem. I can only remember one somewhat largish technical dispute that was resolved by CfC in the last five years. In general the modus operandi is that editors make a call based on input from the WG and people should object to such calls within timely manner if they disagree (preferably constructively and almost definitely before implementations start). In any event, this seems like the wrong way to resolve this issue and will not help defend your eventual decision to the Director either. We should make decisions based on technical merit, not based on decisions or lack thereof of another WG. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 07:37:40 UTC