W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > April 2013

RE: VideoStreamTrack: takePhoto()

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:16:44 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
CC: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Message-ID: <249666637C001845A448E1EA8F1996D00431E9@TK5EX14MBXC292.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
We're all friends here :)

Anne, can you whip up a proposal on how the Media Capture APIs might look with Futures, as well as provide some sample code for us to digest?

-----Original Message-----
From: annevankesteren@gmail.com [mailto:annevankesteren@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 9:49 AM
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Cc: Alex Russell
Subject: Re: VideoStreamTrack: takePhoto()

> I like the concept of futures, but this WG and TF are already an early 
> adopter of a lot of stuff.

I don't really think that's a valid reason to reject this. The callback stuff you're using at the moment is similarly a quite recent addition to the platform toolkit, but a lot worse to develop with for accept/reject tasks.

I'm happy to use the basic W3C Process to get my way, but I'd prefer a friendlier dialogue.


Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 18:17:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:16 UTC