- From: ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ <tommyw@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:36:57 +0200
- To: Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>
- Cc: public-media-capture@w3.org
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 18:37:28 UTC
Well, a MediaStreamTrackList is fine as well :) The difficult to implement thingie is the "union of MediaStream, MediaStreamTrackList and MediaStreamTracks". /Tommy On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hi Tommy, > > > On 9/24/12 4:25 AM, Tommy Widenflycht (ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ) wrote: > >> I have started planning implementing the latest MediaStream constructor >> in WebKit but it is difficult and complex to implement. Changing it to >> take an array of MediaStreamTracks would simplify it significantly >> without making life harder (not by much anyway) for the web developer. >> Opinions? >> > > This was proposed earlier, but Rich made a good argument for why it > shouldn't be an array: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/** > Public/public-media-capture/**2012May/0017.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2012May/0017.html> > > What specifically is the difficulty in taking a MediaStream > MediaStreamTrackList instead of an array? > > Cheers, > -Anant > > > >
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 18:37:28 UTC