- From: Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:18:26 +1100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Surely there has to be some limit to this paranoia? It's quite possible that someone could write code to evaluate the nature of the device and peripherals you're using based on the quality and intrinsic structure of the photos and video feeds your device generates. And the frame content can also be used for facial and object recognition and all kinds of other clever things. Someone could even evaluate the audio stream of you talking to work out your educational background and probable race and income. Does this really mean we should prevent devices from generating image content because it "could" be used in malicious ways!? Isn't it better for us to educate users about the real security implications of the permissions they grant so we can get back to enabling the web platform and realise the amazing potential it really offers. roBman On 11/10/12 19:45, Robin Berjon wrote: > On 10/10/2012 09:59 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> I also wanted to mention another privacy risk induced by AV device >> enumeration: getting a list of all the AV devices a user own does not >> only allow to identify the user passively, it also leaks potentially a >> lot of information about the user: for instance, if the user owns an >> expensive set of AV capture devices, a Web site could assume the user is >> wealthy, and thus start to offer its goods or services with a higher >> price tag. > > It would also make for a lovely extension to http://pleaserobme.com/. >
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 09:18:54 UTC