- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 01:10:40 +0000
- To: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
V4 is now ready. I've posted it on Mercurial for easier reading: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/media-stream-capture/proposals/SettingsAPI_proposal_v4.html Thanks! Looking forward to your continued feedback. > -----Original Message----- > From: Travis Leithead > Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 4:37 PM > To: public-media-capture@w3.org > Subject: Settings API Proposal v3 feedback summary > > Before preparing the 4th version of the settings API proposal, I thought > it would be nice to step back and summarize the feedback received on v3. > I've not been as responsive to responding to individual threads, so I'm > using this one as an opportunity to aggregate all the feedback into one > location. > > There was lots of positive responses. Thank you! > > I have a v4 that I'll be releasing shortly, so stay tuned. > > -Travis > > 1 Liked the approach/heading in the right direction [Rich-2] [Stefan-1] > [Adam-1] > 2 Are all the various dictionaries values read/write or read-only? > [Stefan-1] > 3 Should the constraints/settings be inlined in the spec? (No strong > preference) [Stefan-1] > 4 Is this proposal and constraints applied to gUM complimentary? [Stefan- > 1] > 5 Establishes a nice "source-of-track" pointer [Randell-1] > 6 Derivative of an earlier proposal (suggested in [Randell-2]?) > 7 Doesn't solve multiple consumers competing for changing settings > [Randell-1] (clarified by [Stefan-2/3]) > 8 Forces all tracks that want changes to have a MediaDevice > (PeerConnection, Video element src) [Randell-1] [Stefan-2] > 9 Proposal for unified device/track concept (duck-typing) [Rich-2] > (comments [Travis-2]) > 10 Liked the prior proposal with immutable track lists over the devices- > based LMS [Adam-1] [Adam-3] > 11 takePicture(); how is it related to regular media stream recording? > [Adam-1] > 12 Can the *Info dictionaries be exposed to gUM for early device > filtering? [Adam-1] > 13 Should align with PeerConnection track ideas/ track-subtypes [Adam-2] > 14 Additional settings requested [Giridhar-1] > 15 Proposal on how to scope what settings we expose [Rich-1] > 16 Idea on how to consolidate/group the settings [Josh-1/2] [Jim-1] > [Travis-1] > 17 How do we define interoperable settings (how do we test them)? > [Frederick-1] [Jim-2] > 18 How should UA's optionally surface device-specific settings? [Jim-2] > 19 Re-consider one track-per-type in gUM? [Adam-3] > 20 Don't hide capabilities behind get/changeSettings APIs [Rich-2] > (comments [Travis-2]) > > [Stefan-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0000.html > [Stefan-2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0002.html > [Stefan-3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0003.html > [Randell-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0001.html > [Randell-2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Aug/0044.html > [Adam-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0004.html > [Adam-2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0006.html > [Adam-3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0005.html > [Giridhar-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0008.html > [Rich-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0013.html > [Rich-2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Aug/0144.html > [Josh-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0017.html > [Josh-2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0020.html > [Jim-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0018.html > [Jim-2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0022.html > [Travis-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0019.html > [Travis-2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Aug/0146.html > [Frederick-1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > capture/2012Sep/0021.html > > Additionally, I'm thinking about the following: > * How often will settings be changed in bulk vs. one-at-a-time (with user > feedback)? > * How will developers know to request another device via gUM? (how will > they know that more devices are available)?
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 01:11:15 UTC