RE: revised recording proposal

  Yes, I thought about that a bit.  I don't like using generic buckets either - it seems sloppy - but I couldn't think up a compelling argument for introducing a new interface that would only duplicate functionality that was already available in the generic bucket.  

On the other hand, if the group thinks that a new interface is justified, I'll be glad to introduce one.  

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 3:47 PM
To: Jim Barnett
Cc: Mandyam, Giridhar; Timothy B. Terriberry;
Subject: Re: revised recording proposal

On 30 November 2012 10:47, Jim Barnett <> wrote:
> CustomEvent has a .detail attribute where you can stick whatever you want.

I'd really like to avoid having to use a generic bucket for these very specific data.

At this stage, there is only one burning question: Where do I get the blob from when I get a dataavailable event?

Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 20:50:18 UTC