- From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:49:49 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Martin, Yes, I thought about that a bit. I don't like using generic buckets either - it seems sloppy - but I couldn't think up a compelling argument for introducing a new interface that would only duplicate functionality that was already available in the generic bucket. On the other hand, if the group thinks that a new interface is justified, I'll be glad to introduce one. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 3:47 PM To: Jim Barnett Cc: Mandyam, Giridhar; Timothy B. Terriberry; public-media-capture@w3.org Subject: Re: revised recording proposal On 30 November 2012 10:47, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com> wrote: > CustomEvent has a .detail attribute where you can stick whatever you want. I'd really like to avoid having to use a generic bucket for these very specific data. At this stage, there is only one burning question: Where do I get the blob from when I get a dataavailable event?
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 20:50:18 UTC