- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:52:22 +0100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 11/12/2012 01:06 PM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: > On 2012-10-16 17:32, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: >> On 10/09/2012 04:52 PM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >>> On 2012-10-08 11:32, Tommy Widenflycht (ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ) wrote: >>>> Ping on this. Implementation details aside no other API takes a >>>> mix-n-match of different objects. An ordinary JS array with Tracks >>>> or a >>>> MediaStreamtrackList is still my strong preference. >>> >>> Looking at from usage point of view. I think the most common use case >>> would be to clone a stream. >>> >>> var clonedStream = new MediaStream(stream); >>> >>> If we optimize for that case we get: >>> >>> Idl: [Constructor (MediaStream stream)] >>> >>> An alternative to that is to also allow a list streams to combine >>> streams: >>> >>> var clonedStream = new MediaStream(stream); >>> var cobinedStream = new MediaStream([stream1, stream2]) >>> >>> Idl: [Constructor ((MediaStream or MediaStream[]) streams)] >>> >>> WebSocket does this for its protocols argument. >>> >>> >>> A case that's not as common but very powerful is to pick single tracks >>> from any source: >>> >>> // create a stream with specific tracks for a recording >>> var audioStream = new MediaStream([ >>> stream1.audioTracks[0], >>> stream2.audioTracks[0] >>> ]); >>> >>> To support that we need: >>> Idl: [Constructor (MediaStreamTrack[] tracks)] >>> >>> >>> My guess is that people will mostly use streams and tracks since those >>> are the objects that they interact with regularly. But that just >>> speculation from my side. >> >> If I understand correctly, you say that it would make sense to allow >> option 1 (i.e. clone MediaStreams) and 3 (i.e. be able to pick track by >> track). >> >> This makes a lot of sense to me since it is simple to do the simple >> thing (clone MS), but still allows more advanced cases. > > This has been silent for a while. Unless anyone objects, I'll update > the spec with this simpler approach. > > /Adam > > Sounds good to me. Please do.
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 08:51:22 UTC