- From: Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 22:07:08 -0700
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 5/9/2012 9:00 PM, Randell Jesup wrote: > On 5/9/2012 11:20 PM, Anant Narayanan wrote: >> I haven't mentioned MediaStreamTrackLists though, because I think they >> are a redundant type that may simply be represented as an array of >> MediaStreamTracks. If there are good reasons to keep the >> MediaStreamTrackList around, please do let me know. Otherwise, we can >> modify the MediaStream object to be: > > Well, in theory the arrays of local and remote streams are 'live' > arrays, and it also was said on the list that they don't compact when > one is removed (to make them easy to match up with SDP m= lines) - > though I have to say that MediaStreams don't map well to m= lines if a > MediaStream as < or > 1 stream of a given type... We could retain this behavior even with just a simple array type instead of a special object, right? > We need to have a clear mapping of MediaStreams, MediaStreamTracks, and > SDP m= lines including for complex cases with tracks and streams being > added and removed. Agreed! -Anant
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 05:07:38 UTC