W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > June 2012

Re: MediaStream Constructor

From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:52:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4FD9A644.4080206@ericsson.com>
To: Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>
CC: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2012-05-15 19:40, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 06:47 AM, Rich Tibbett wrote:
>> Anant Narayanan wrote:
>>>> On 2012-05-10 13:32, Rich Tibbett wrote:
>>>>> We could certainly tighten up the definition of the
>>>>> MediaStreamTrackList
>>>>> collection interface and I would be happy to take an action to propose
>>>>> some text here.
>>> Sounds great, thanks Rich!
>> What would be the best way to do this? Plain text in an email, forking
>> the spec to add the proposal in ReSpec markup so it can be copied
>> verbatim in to the spec on approval or adding and committing the updates
>> directly to the spec in the version control system?
> All of the above! Use any mechanism you are comfortable with and I'll
> make sure the text ends up in the right place.

I was going to propose some changes to the MediaStream() constructor 
algorithm, but I think it would be best to move to the new argument list 

What's the status on this Rich? I can write something up if you feel 
that you don't have the time.

Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 08:52:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:10 UTC