- From: Sunyang (Eric) <eric.sun@huawei.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:57:30 +0000
- To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Hi all, My suggestion to agenda 1705 Requirement Use Case 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5 should be kept in specification. Use Case of 2.3 is mainly about mediastream processing, which is in mediastream group scope Requirement should be separated to following kind Control/Permission Content Playback Multi-Devices/Parties Privacity What's more the use case should be modified to has a formal format Like: short abbreviation, motivation, derived requirement, and has a list number, for example uc 1, uc 2 etc Yang Huawei -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Stefan Hakansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2012年6月5日 17:11 收件人: public-media-capture@w3.org 主题: Telco, details + draft agenda Time: 5pm - 6.30pm CET (GMT + 2) Thursday June 7th IRC: #mediacap on irc.w3.org, port 6665 Zakim conf code: 6227 ("mcap") Draft agenda (proposals are as always more than welcome!): ============================================================ 1700 * Welcome, scribe * Approve minutes 1705 * Requirements: - agree on valid set of scenarios (should be rtcweb scenarios + TF’s scenarios) ( - Go over how we need to specify requirements - Prioritize requirements, because we’re not going to meet them all in phase 1 1735 * MediaStream integration with media elements (Jim Barnett) (basis email on May 18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2012May/att-0064/MediaStreamsAsMediaElements.html) 1740 * Discuss updated proposal of definition of the MediaStreamTrackList collection interface (Rich Tibbet; if sent on list before meeting) 1745 * Resource reservation: discuss proposal by Anant (should be sent on list before meeting) 1755 * Verify that there are no remaining open issues on Constraints (Dan Burnett). 1805 * Review the open items at http://www.w3.org/wiki/Media_Capture#Open_Items; Editors to ask for help if needed 1815 * Identify stuff that needs to be resolved in the WebRTC / RTCWEB meetings (if any) 1825 * AoB 1830 * Close ===================================================== Stefan for the chairs
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 09:10:33 UTC