W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Revised getUserMedia editor's draft available

From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:33:33 -0400
Message-ID: <4FC9B3BD.9090107@jesup.org>
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 6/1/2012 10:35 PM, Dan Burnett wrote:
> 1. The original proposal that I wrote very clearly stated that only the semantics of the constraint processing algorithm needed to be followed, rather than the precise steps of the algorithm. However, the original text for getusermedia processing requires literal implementation of the steps of the algorithm.  Since some people on this list do not want to implement the constraint algorithm precisely as given for efficiency reasons, can anyone suggest how we can adjust the wording at the top of the algorithm to accommodate this?

Perhaps something along the lines of "The implementation must produce a 
result equivalent to running the following algorithm:"

Randell Jesup
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 06:36:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:10 UTC