- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:35:12 +0200
- To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
- Cc: public-media-capture@w3.org
Le jeudi 31 mai 2012 à 08:20 -0600, Cullen Jennings a écrit : > Two side questions on testing ... > > Could we use a repo in the W3C area on github (https://github.com/w3c) instead of mercurial ? There is actually integration between the mercurial repository and our test framework http://w3c-test.org/framework/ so that wouldn't be entirely trivial. That being said, I know that other groups have a dual presence on github and dvcs.w3.org, and it might be that in general we're better served by having this situation as well. I assume you're asking for github to make it easier to contribute to the test suite? > Could you include in the test some sort of automation tool so that the text can be run in an automated form ? That's already the case; the reason for including testharness.js and testharnessreport.js in each test case is precisely to make automation possible; see for instance how Mozilla are using it: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647323 Dom > > On May 31, 2012, at 4:35 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As getUserMedia matures and is getting deployed, the need to ensure > > interoperability across implementation increases; the only right way to > > ensure that interoperability is to have tests. > > > > While formally we only need to show interoperability during Candidate > > Recommendation, I think it's worthwhile starting to create tests now, > > even if that means that some of these tests will have to modified to > > keep up with changes in the spec. > > > > This message tries to serve as a general intro to how we do testing at > > W3C. > > > > At a high level, a test case for a JavaScript API is an HTML file that > > exercises a specific aspect of the API and tries to determine if the API > > behaves as specified or not when run in the browser under test. > > > > W3C groups working in this space use a common framework to develop test > > cases that facilitate automating the run of these test cases, as well as > > the collection of results from browsers running them. That test harness > > is described at: > > http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Harness > > > > Unless there is a strong reason not to, I think we too should adopt that > > harness for the development of our test cases. > > > > Process-wise, I think we should also follow the way of other groups: > > * have someone in the group designed as the test facilitator, that > > ensures that test cases get submitted, reviewed, approved > > > > * test cases should be submitted either by email or better by uploading > > them to a dedicated mercurial repository; I've created > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/media-capture/file/tip to that end, to which > > anyone in DAP and WebRTC should have read-write access > > > > * test cases are first put into the "submitted" directory; they'll get > > moved to "approved" once the group gets a chance to review and approve > > them > > > > * we can also accept contribution of test cases from non group > > participants; I can explain more about the logistics of this when needed > > > > We probably need to define how we want to review and approve test cases; > > different groups have had different approaches. But that's probably > > easier done once we have found a test facilitator for the spec :) > > > > I've started creating test cases which I hope can also serve as useful > > starting points for other contributors; I'll give more details about > > this in a separate mail. > > > > Dom > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 09:39:35 UTC