W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Constraints structure and Capabilities API

From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:01:00 -0500
Message-Id: <445B57AF-E297-484D-89D2-AD65ECA82ABF@voxeo.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
I agree 100% and am open to suggestions on how to make it more hierarchical.

-- dan

On Feb 23, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 23 February 2012 12:29, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote:
>> Cullen, Neil, Tim Panton, and I have come up with the following proposal for Constraints and for Capabilities.  The latter is for the trusted case.  We can work out a subset of information to provide in the case where the Javascript/web developer is not trusted.
> Looks like a reasonable idea.  But every time I see a flat namespace
> like that it makes me cringe.
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 14:01:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:08 UTC