- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:06:05 +0000
- To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Rich brought up a topic a while ago that may merit some discussion, as I'm also interested in the same: Rationale for keeping the definition of the MediaStream interface in the WebRTC spec. I know that both PeerConnection and getUserMedia are entry points to get/create media streams. So I'd like to start a conversation about which spec should define the MediaStream interface and why. >-----Original Message----- >From: Stefan Hakansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] >Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 5:23 AM >To: public-media-capture@w3.org >Subject: [media cap] 1st draft agenda for telco > >Hi all, > >below is a very first draft of agenda for the telco (coming up this >Thursday Feb 9th at 5.00PM CET): > >* Welcome >* Scribe >* Capabilities and privacy >** Recap of capabilities vs. privacy/fingerprinting discussion at webrtc >mtg >** Discussion >* Scenarios doc (Travis) >** Move to FPWD? >* GetUserMedia doc (Dan/Anant) >** Status >** Discuss input made by Anant > >Please provide input to the agenda proposal! > >Stefan for the chairs >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:45:07 UTC