- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:09:22 +0100
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- CC: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2012-12-21 21:03, Travis Leithead wrote: >> From: Mandyam, Giridhar [mailto:mandyam@quicinc.com] > >> I think that the merged document can still have 'remote' as part of the >> SourceTypeEnum, but any discussion about constraints and their >> applicability to remote sources should be clearly marked as TBD or even >> out-of-scope. > > I agree. Me too; I think the remote sources should be described in the webrtc document. After all, the only way to get a "remote source" is to use a PeerConnection object - and that belongs in WebRTC land.
Received on Saturday, 22 December 2012 14:09:48 UTC