- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:04:33 +0100
- To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- CC: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 2012-12-07 19:59, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: > On 12/07/2012 07:00 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> On 6 December 2012 22:44, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> >> wrote: >>> Could we have a solution where the selector UI is always shown even >>> though >>> no "real" devices met the mandatory constraints? In that case you could >>> still select a file to emulate, e.g., a camera. >> >> A few reasons that I don't like this idea: >> - getUserMedia is not the right API for non-device sources of media > > That perfectly right - there are separate APIs for selecting e.g. Files > resident on the user's computer, and we should use those for cases when > the _app_ would prefer a file as a source rather than a real device. > > But as Tim pointed out, this is not about selecting non-device sources > primarily, it is about giving power to the user to select a file instead > of a camera as source for e.g. privacy reasons. The thinking originally > was that the app would not know if the source was a file or a real > camera (I don't know if that is realistic given that a file can't zoom > etc., and perhaps all cameras can. What Stefan says here is exactly my thinking around non-device media and getUserMedia(). /Adam > This has been in the draft since the beginning; I do not really know the > importance of this (though I have sympathy for giving more power to the > user).
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 07:08:14 UTC