Re: Combined synchronous gUM proposal proposal from Martin Thomson on 2012-12-07 (public-media-capture@w3.org from December 2012)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:01:45 -0800
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Cc: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVyY+FDDNvpwepTvFE0e3eR9e+oTL_2LpEr1ZpMDpfJsQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 7 December 2012 09:24, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Personally, it would be much simpler to only specify [constraints] either on the track constructors or the getUserMedia call, but not both for the above reason.

That was my thought.  Even as it is, we have two ways to do the same
thing.  Having two _competing_ ways would be nuts :)

Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 18:02:13 UTC