- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:17:25 +0100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 2012-12-05 01:30, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > Martin Thomson wrote: >> I don't see this as gUM. Maybe there is an adjunct API that produces >> a MediaStream from a file. > > We've talked about a captureUntilEnded on the <video> tag before, but > that requires the application to be written so that it can use it. I > think the idea behind allowing users to select a video file instead of a > camera is to let those who don't want to share a camera (or possibly > don't even have one) use applications that were not otherwise designed > to work in this scenario. I.e., it's about user-empowerment, not about > providing a technical feature in the API. Exactly, that is what this is about.
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 09:04:01 UTC