- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:11:32 +0100
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Le mercredi 07 décembre 2011 à 18:22 +0000, Travis Leithead a écrit : > So my conclusions are that: > 1. MediaStreams and Streams are sufficiently different that they should not attempt to be "combined" logically. > 2. Streams serve as an excellent output format from a MediaStream recorder (rather than a Blob). To the risk of starting a bikeshedding discussion, is there a way to find a different name for one or the other of the two interfaces, if they can't be linked by an inheritance logic? It's very likely to cause a lot of confusion if Stream and MediaStream aren't actually strongly related. Would MediaSource work for instance? MediaConduit? MediaChannel? Or maybe Stream should be StreamedBlob? Dom
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 09:11:49 UTC